This model used a 3.2-liter V6 with 215 hp and 230 lb-ft of torque. Things finally start to pick up with the C 320, which was available on the earlier W203 models. The confusion continues with the C 240, which uses a slightly larger 2.6-liter V6, but puts out 173 hp and 180 lb-ft of torque, which drops the 0-60 time to a slightly anemic 10 seconds. This engine actually performed worse than the Kompressor, with a 0-60 time closer to nine seconds, and a top speed of 146 mph. Specifically, it was a 2.5-liter unit putting out 201 hp and 181 lb-ft of torque. While it's somewhat of a conundrum, the C 230 with no Kompressor used a V6 engine. RELATED: These Are The Sickest Mercedes-Benz C-Class Models Ever Made The W203 C-Class is actually far closer to a compact hatchback in sizing than it is a modern sedan of its type. The W203 C-Class is nine inches shorter than the current W206 C-Class, and its wheelbase is six inches shorter. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the C-Class design, which is especially interesting to analyze from a modern perspective, is the size. The side profile is classic sedan, while the rear end features a fairly simple design, and the standard 2000s Mercedes taillight design. The front bumper is also pretty simple, changing only a little bit depending on the trim level that you have. The front features the infamous double-circle headlights, which actually incorporate themselves well with the rest of the car. While most people bash on this era of Mercedes-Benz design, the C-Class does a surprisingly good job of it. One of the most obvious changes between the first and second gen C-Class is the exterior design. RELATED: Here Is Why The Third-Gen Mercedes-Benz C-Class Is A Diamond In The Rough
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |